Dis-curse-ive
The (A) Anti- (C) Christ (L) Loves (U) Us -NOT
A US federal court in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, opened Monday to hear whether the so-called "intelligent design" doctrine should be taught in basic schools to challenge Charles Darwin's theory of evolution.
The Prince of Darkness ally, the ACLU, is leading the fight against "intelligent design" in this case.
Kenneth Miller, a Brown University professor. If nearly all original species are extinct, then the "intelligent design" creator was not very intelligent.
Kenneth Miller, repent or die in your sins for calling God The Almighty "not very intelligent".
I happen to disagree. I felt that I should voice my differences of opinion with this blogger on his comments page and wrote the following:
He Hate Me said...
I am a Clevelander and a Brown student and a liberal so you probably are not a big fan of mine. However, I must take exception to your post "The (A) Anti- (C) Christ (L) Loves (U) Us -NOT."
First, I don't think that the ACLU is an ally of the prince of darkness. I think they are well-meaning citizens who have dedicated themselves to preserving the ideals of American democracy. It is completely understandable to disagree with their beliefs or judgment but I feel that it is unneccessarily harsh to relate them with the prince of darkness.
Secondly, I don't believe that Professor Miller was saying that the Almighty was "not very intelligent." In fact, the point he is making is the very opposite. He is saying that a belief in intelligent design could be seen as blasphemous becuase it would mean that the Almighty created creatures that were not capable of sustainability or survival.
This, of course, is beside the point. The reason that the ACLU and its allies wish to teach Darwinistic evolution theory and leave out intelligent design (a codeword for creationism) is because they believe that science should be taught in schools and religion should be taught in church. Evolution is a theory backed by facts. It may, in fact, be incorrect but given the test of the scientific method, it stands up to scrutiny. Creative design, on the other hand, is based in faith rather than science. The ACLU and its allies are not against faith or religion. They simply believe that it should be taught in church rather than the publicly-funded schools.
Thank you for your attention.
America Is Great! said...
You are right when you said "I don't think"
Wow.
In classic passive-agressive Hu style, I wrote the following response to the response:
He Hate Me said...
Dear Sir,
Frankly, I am hurt and disappointed by your refusal to take my comment seriously and engage in an intellectual debate of ideas. I was hoping to have an informed, lively debate with a fellow Clevelander on the very serious moral and political dilemmas of our times. Instead, I feel like your response was dismissive and purposely offensive. It is my belief that America works best when everyone can bring their ideas to the public square in a climate of civility to discuss the topics of the day. I do not think that name-calling and put-downs are constructive in the building of consensus or community. Honestly, I feel unwanted and unwelcomed at your blog and feel that I should find an online community more conducive to my ideals of democracy rooted in mutual respect.
Thank you for your attention.
Powerless Liberals Toasting Mr. Delay Short Lived
"...Eggs on their faces again for liberals. Justice again will slip away. Why? I believe it boils down to a lesser of two evils. Democrats are not the lesser evil. Their tactics are well known. The majority of liberals are godless creatures that think they are better than others. The liberal ego is soo big, truth is whatever you decide is in your best interest.
The facts are very vague and Delay is very cunning. Delay knows the law and whether he hugs that line is not in question here. The question is did he cross that line."
I like the slavery reference in this post:
Republicans Need Another African American Supreme Court Justice
"The democrats will continue to look more and more like bigots for not supporting an African American justice. They whipped Clarence Thomas at his hearings, could they do it again and get away with it? Nope.
Making the democrats look bad is just icing on the cake. Having a republican controlled Supreme Court is the whole cake. We can have our cake with icing and eat it too! Nominate an African American to be our next Supreme Court Justice."
And in this post, he just tells us the bottom line...
Before You Side With Democrats Consider This
Al Gore attended a money funneling event/fundraiser for the DNC at a buddhist temple then claimed he never knew about it being a fundraiser. Buddhist monks were used in a money funneling scam to the DNC...
So while they bask in the "We're soo much better than Republicans" think again. They are definetely worse, worse at politics, worse at corruption, worse at trampling the laws of this great land. Beware of the smoke and mirrors, the Democrats are the craftiest liars known to America.They have single handedly criminalized politics for their own interests. If you can't beat them at the polls, give them a lawsuit instead. Shame on Democrats, never again should they be allowed to gain power. Consider this, Democrats take malicious pleasure at the misfortune of others, thats just pure evil. Do to other what you want done to yourselves. He without sin cast the first stone. Democrats are evil creatures. (emphasis mine)
Comments are welcome.
2 Comments:
"The majority of liberals are godless creatures that think they are better than others."
Damn straight.
More seriously though, this guy clearly does not realize his massive inconsistency when he says: "He without sin cast the first stone. Democrats are evil creatures."
I wrote a long comment, but then it got erased when I went to look back at that guy's blog. But the basic message was: POLITICAL BLOGS ARE UNIFORMLY DEPRESSING.
Post a Comment
<< Home